Towards a new understanding
The First International gave way to the second, after 1872- the Marxists won and excluded the anarchists, syndicalists, utopians, trade unionists, etc.
Fascism arose, in part, as a reaction against the modern world, or "modernity." (1922, roughly..)...Fascism is often characterized more by what it is against, rather than what it is for- anti Communist, anti Liberal, anti democratic,anti bourgeois, and anti-Capitalist etc..
But this is not where our analysis should end- one could argue that the rise of the fascists was actually a reconquest of the International. The so called extreme rightists had a decidedly "left wing" economic platform- agrarian reform, old age pensions, minimum wage, nationalizations of the banks, profit -sharing, national health service, etc. The appeal was populist- large industry had work toward the good of the nation, and in Nazi Germany's case, the good of the 'race.'
Jose Antonio Prima de Rivera founded the Falange (Phalanx) in Spain in 1933- the goal was national unity and salvation, the economy was to based upon national-syndicalism.
Here we see a similarity with Mussolini's 'corporate state,' where parliaments based upon geography are replaced by a parliament of trade unionists. There was to be one vertical trade labor union.
In Germany, the concept of folk or the Volkisch movement acted as a way to dissolve class struggle- when combined with the corporatist Congresses, the Marxist argument disappears, class struggle is subsumed by the efforts to raise up the race, or the people,expressed by the state. This is why individualism is downplayed, since biologic laws function more according to groups rather than single persons.
North central European peoples- Germans, Americans, etc... are laid back, easy going, naive, long suffering...this is why the Juden excel with their designs to destroy the West. They are ultra crafty, wily, conniving, and ethno-network to the nth degree.This is why Hitler had to emerge. Germany was caught in a pincer - the capitalist bankers had seized the country from the top, and communists were seizing the nation from the bottom. This is why the government had to be use emergency powers and became authoritarian. Germany's neighbors were led by military dictatorships-Poland, the Balkans, Russia, Italy, Spain- all these countries were authoritarian too, so Hitler was just expressing the spirit of the age.
We must note- when the Soviets took power in 1917 in Russia, all hell broke out. In particular, Stalin in 1932 holocaust-ed about 6 million Ukrainians during a famine- the Holodomor disaster. The National Socialists in Germany were always mindful of this- that the Reds were quite often savages, and the Red leaders were Jews.
Do not think for a second that the Nazi's were merely 'brown Bolsheviks' or 'Red fascists'.. National Socialism recognized race, while the Marxists deny races exist. This is a huge difference.
White Europeans are too 'nice,' they are too eager to assist someone whom they think is in a helpless situation...this is why the enemies of the West portray themselves as victims....The Jews are not necessarily smarter than the Nordics, its just that there are differing characteristics or traits at work...
Churchill offered the real reason for the war- Germany had become too strong, they had become a serious rival to England. The Brits did not care one bit about what happened to the Poles. Evidence for this is seen in several ways- Britain recognized Italy's annexation of Ethiopia, that was OK... when the Russians invaded Poland two weeks after Hitler did, the Brits never declared war on Russia, did they? And we see how Poland was tossed to the tender mercies of the Soviets once the war was over.
Adolph Hitler was never self consciously evil. He was a capable artist, a brave soldier (earning the Iron Cross first and second class)...Everyone who knew him as a youth and a young man reports that he was always polite. Hitler communed with nature, wrote sonnets, plays, he appreciated high art or music, culture and history was important to him......Off -color jokes were not allowed in his presence. He was not a demagogue- he never promised the Germans anything. He was not an opportunist- he was a patriot.
Now... we find ourselves caught between two opposing forces, humanity locked in a fight to the death- the nation -state versus the international cartels. This is how politics must be re aligned- we can fight to preserve our folk or we can be ruled by faceless bureaucrats from overseas. It is the people against the mega banks and their corporations. The false left-right paradigm must fall before our new understanding.
Fascism arose, in part, as a reaction against the modern world, or "modernity." (1922, roughly..)...Fascism is often characterized more by what it is against, rather than what it is for- anti Communist, anti Liberal, anti democratic,anti bourgeois, and anti-Capitalist etc..
But this is not where our analysis should end- one could argue that the rise of the fascists was actually a reconquest of the International. The so called extreme rightists had a decidedly "left wing" economic platform- agrarian reform, old age pensions, minimum wage, nationalizations of the banks, profit -sharing, national health service, etc. The appeal was populist- large industry had work toward the good of the nation, and in Nazi Germany's case, the good of the 'race.'
Jose Antonio Prima de Rivera founded the Falange (Phalanx) in Spain in 1933- the goal was national unity and salvation, the economy was to based upon national-syndicalism.
Here we see a similarity with Mussolini's 'corporate state,' where parliaments based upon geography are replaced by a parliament of trade unionists. There was to be one vertical trade labor union.
In Germany, the concept of folk or the Volkisch movement acted as a way to dissolve class struggle- when combined with the corporatist Congresses, the Marxist argument disappears, class struggle is subsumed by the efforts to raise up the race, or the people,expressed by the state. This is why individualism is downplayed, since biologic laws function more according to groups rather than single persons.
North central European peoples- Germans, Americans, etc... are laid back, easy going, naive, long suffering...this is why the Juden excel with their designs to destroy the West. They are ultra crafty, wily, conniving, and ethno-network to the nth degree.This is why Hitler had to emerge. Germany was caught in a pincer - the capitalist bankers had seized the country from the top, and communists were seizing the nation from the bottom. This is why the government had to be use emergency powers and became authoritarian. Germany's neighbors were led by military dictatorships-Poland, the Balkans, Russia, Italy, Spain- all these countries were authoritarian too, so Hitler was just expressing the spirit of the age.
We must note- when the Soviets took power in 1917 in Russia, all hell broke out. In particular, Stalin in 1932 holocaust-ed about 6 million Ukrainians during a famine- the Holodomor disaster. The National Socialists in Germany were always mindful of this- that the Reds were quite often savages, and the Red leaders were Jews.
Do not think for a second that the Nazi's were merely 'brown Bolsheviks' or 'Red fascists'.. National Socialism recognized race, while the Marxists deny races exist. This is a huge difference.
White Europeans are too 'nice,' they are too eager to assist someone whom they think is in a helpless situation...this is why the enemies of the West portray themselves as victims....The Jews are not necessarily smarter than the Nordics, its just that there are differing characteristics or traits at work...
Churchill offered the real reason for the war- Germany had become too strong, they had become a serious rival to England. The Brits did not care one bit about what happened to the Poles. Evidence for this is seen in several ways- Britain recognized Italy's annexation of Ethiopia, that was OK... when the Russians invaded Poland two weeks after Hitler did, the Brits never declared war on Russia, did they? And we see how Poland was tossed to the tender mercies of the Soviets once the war was over.
Adolph Hitler was never self consciously evil. He was a capable artist, a brave soldier (earning the Iron Cross first and second class)...Everyone who knew him as a youth and a young man reports that he was always polite. Hitler communed with nature, wrote sonnets, plays, he appreciated high art or music, culture and history was important to him......Off -color jokes were not allowed in his presence. He was not a demagogue- he never promised the Germans anything. He was not an opportunist- he was a patriot.
Now... we find ourselves caught between two opposing forces, humanity locked in a fight to the death- the nation -state versus the international cartels. This is how politics must be re aligned- we can fight to preserve our folk or we can be ruled by faceless bureaucrats from overseas. It is the people against the mega banks and their corporations. The false left-right paradigm must fall before our new understanding.
posted by Zero at 5:14 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home